Inkubator izvrsnosti
Daruj
antifragilnost

Antifragilnost: najbolja strategija za tvoje mentalno zdravlje

VFValentino Findrik6 min čitanja

Na blogu smo više puta pisali o mentalnom zdravlju i psihološkoj otpornosti, ali i o tome da postoji nešto čak bolje od psihološke otpornosti, a to je antifragilnost. U ovom članku govorimo o tome zašto je antifragilnost prava stvar za mentalno zdravlje te o strategijama kojima možeš provjeriti koliko si (anti)fragilan/a i kako stres u različitim situacijama pretvoriti u svoju korist.


Jesi li antifragilan/a?

Antifragilnost najjednostavnije možemo definirati kao čovjekovu sposobnost da u određenim uvjetima može imati koristi od podražaja koje jednom riječju nazivamo “stresom”. Drugim riječima, umjesto da si na takve stvari samo otporan/a, od njih možeš čak imati neku korist. Koji su to sve podražaji i što sve možemo smatrati stresom – to je teško precizno odrediti.

Možemo reći da postoji onoliko mogućih definicija stresa koliko i ljudi. Ti sigurno imaš određene stvari u životu koje osobno doživljavaš stresnima, a drugi ljudi možda ne. I obratno: netko koga poznaješ sigurno vidi stres u nekim stvarima koje su tebi potpuno normalne i ni po čemu problematične.


Kad govorimo o antifragilnosti, važno je poznavati i ova tri pravila:

  1. Moraš poznavati sebe: Ako želiš dugoročno unaprijediti svoje mentalno zdravlje, važnije je da za tebe da znaš jesi li i koliko si fragilan/a, nego da možeš predvidjeti kada ćeš idući put doživjeti nešto stresno. Zato trebaš dobro poznavati sebe, posebno svoje slabosti, i onda postupno raditi na tome da fragilnost pretvaraš u antifragilnost.
  2. Antifragilnost ovisi o kontekstu: Povezano s time da smo svi različiti i svi imamo svoje shvaćanje stresa, i antifragilnost se razlikuje od situacije do situacije. Nije isto biti antifragilan na poslu, u međuljudskim odnosima ili u sitnim pojedinostima svakodnevnog života (vidi primjere dolje).
  3. Antifragilnost je ograničena: Iako gotovo u svakoj situaciji možeš biti antifragilan/a, tj. imati koristi od stresa, trebaš znati da je to ograničena sposobnost. Kroz sljedećih nekoliko primjera bit će ti jasnije kako procijeniti svoju antifragilnost u različitim situacijama.


Antifragilnost na poslu

Ako želiš cjelovito raditi na svom mentalnom zdravlju, onda ne smiješ zanemariti utjecaj koji na tvoje mentalno zdravlje može imati posao koji radiš. Ako si na poslu redovito izložen/a stresu i možda bi čak radije radio/la nešto drugo, ali ne znaš što ili se ne usudiš dati otkaz, onda si u tom kontekstu fragilan/a. Ako ništa ne učiniš, svaki novi izazov, novi rok i svaki sastanak koji radije ne bi imao/la samo će pojačavati tvoju fragilnost, a konačni rezultat toga može biti i burnout. To sigurno želiš izbjeći.


na poslu


Prema teoriji antifragilnosti Nassima Nicholasa Taleba, koji je i skovao taj pojam, jedan od glavnih uzroka fragilnosti jest nedostatak opcija. I obratno, što više opcija, to veća antifragilnost. U kontekstu stresa na poslu, to bi značilo da ako želiš postati antifragilan, trebaš poraditi na svojim opcijama. Evo o čemu trebaš razmisliti:


  • Kad bi mogao/la birati, što bi drugo radio/la? Što te u tome sprječava? Možeš li možda upisati neki tečaj ili edukaciju s kojom bi lakše mogao/la doći do svog idealnog posla? Je li ti tvoj posao jedini izvor prihoda? Imaš li neke dodatne opcije za to? Čak i ako ne, imaš li dovoljno štednje u svom “kriznom fondu” koja bi ti omogućila određeno prijelazno razdoblje između trenutnog i potencijalnog novog posla? Ako ne, što možeš učiniti da to osiguraš?
  • Ako imaš druge opcije koje možeš raditi i dovoljno si financijski stabilan da ti otkaz ne bi bio prevelik problem, ali ipak iz bilo kojeg razloga još uvijek ne želiš otići s posla koji ti svakodnevno stvara stres, jedan mali trik koji ti može dodatno pomoći u stresnim uvjetima na poslu jest lažno otkazno pismo. Napiši detaljno otkazno pismo i u njemu reci sve što ti smeta i što ne voliš, sve što svima zamjeraš, a onda ga spremi negdje na dohvat ruke, npr. u ladicu u radnom stolu. Tako ćeš se kod svake iduće stresne situacije moći prisjetiti da imaš spremno otkazno pismo i da u bilo kojem trenutku možeš odlučiti dati otkaz. Čak i ako to ne učiniš, svaka takva stresna situacija podsjetit će te na činjenicu da ti kontroliraš situaciju i da u bilo kojem trenutku možeš odlučiti kad ti je dosta.


Antifragilnost u odnosima i komunikaciji

Mnogima su međuljudski odnosi velik izvor stresa i općenito izazova za mentalno zdravlje. Prema uvriježenim stereotipima osobe koje imaju problema s međuljudskim odnosima obično su introvertirane, sramežljive, pasivne itd. No to ne mora biti tako. Netko može biti socijalno anksiozan i zbog toga što ima previsoko mišljenje o sebi te se boji “riskirati” svoj zamišljeni “ugled” pred drugima. To se posebno vidi u situacijama kao što su različiti društveni događaji:


u komunikaciji


  • Ako ti sama pomisao o druženju s većim brojem ljudi, pogotovo nepoznatih ljudi, stvara anksioznost i tjera te da unaprijed smišljaš kreativne izgovore zašto se ipak nećeš pojaviti, onda ti je vjerojatno jasno da si u tom pogledu fragilan/a. Ako to želiš promijeniti, prvo što trebaš shvatiti jest da ti nisi najvažniji/a i da nisi u središtu pozornosti. Najvažnije, ne bi trebao/la biti u središtu svoje pozornosti.
  • Socijalna anksioznost općenito proizlazi iz razmišljanja o tome kako nas drugi vide, što o nama misle, što će nam se dogoditi itd. Ali ako se iz razmišljanja o “ja, ja, ja, ja” prebacimo u razmišljanje o “ti, ti, ti, ti”, svaki takav događaj odmah skroz drukčiju perspektivu. Postavi se tako kao da je svaka osoba na tom druženju prilika da toj osobi postaviš neko pitanje, da joj kažeš nešto lijepo ili (ako vidiš da je jednako nervozna kao i ti) da joj pomogneš da se opusti. U tom procesu ne samo da ćeš učiniti nešto dobro za druge, nego ćeš se i ti pokazati u dobrom svjetlu. Tako ono što si dotad smatrao/la stresnim odjednom može postati prilikom za nešto dobro.


Antifragilnost u svakodnevici

Antifragilnost kao strategija za mentalno zdravlje može se primijeniti i u najsitnijim dijelovima svakodnevice. Primjerice, osim što tvoja (anti)fragilnost ovisi o opcijama kojima u određenom kontekstu raspolažeš, ona ovisi i o tome koliko si jako navezan/a na nešto što posjeduješ ili na očekivanja koja imaš. Jedan razlog za to je kognitivna pristranost koju nazivamo nesklonost gubitku, zbog koje nas više pogađa neki gubitak, nego što nas veseli jednako vrijedan dobitak. A što bi u tom slučaju bilo antifragilno? Pogađaš – obrnuto. Antifragilan/a si onda kada u situaciji određenog stresa možeš više dobiti, nego izgubiti. Evo primjer kako to možeš postići:

Svi znamo koliko stresno može biti kada nas počne izjedati neizvjesnost oko nečega što smo planirali ili nečega čemu smo se nadali. Bilo da se radi o dogovorenom druženju, o planovima za putovanje ili bilo kojoj aktivnosti za koju si se pripremio/la, čim se pojavi neizvjesnost da se to možda neće ostvariti, a pogotovo ako se ispostavi da doista neće, takva iskustva su posebna vrsta stresa – pogotovo ako si osoba koja voli planirati i znati unaprijed.

Ako u takvim situacijama želiš osigurati antifragilnost, onda pored glavnog plana unaprijed pripremi nekoliko stvari koje silno želiš raditi, ali za njih možda nemaš vremena. To treba biti zaista nešto što te zanima i što želiš raditi prvom prilikom (npr. pogledati neki film, čitati knjigu, kupiti nešto, otići na izlet, javiti se dragom prijatelju kojeg dugo nisi vidio/la itd.). U tom slučaju, kad ti prvi plan propadne, nećeš u tome vidjeti samo gubitak tog plana, nego i priliku da činiš nešto od svega ostalog na popisu. Zapamti: opcije!


_________________________

Želiš znati više o antifragilnosti i kako je ostvariti u svom životu? Na pravom si mjestu!

Prijavi se na edukaciju Stres pod kontrolom i nauči sve o antifragilnosti i mnogim drugim psihološkim metodama i alatima koji će ti pomoći da postaneš snažnija i sretnija verzija sebe.

Još s bloga

Sve objave

More Than Money: Why Financial Literacy Is a Democratic Competence

Reflections from the Financial and Economic Literacy NECE Lab, Vienna, 27–28 April 2026 When we talk about financial literacy, most people picture budgeting apps, savings accounts, and the fine print on a loan agreement. Useful things, but a narrow picture. Increasingly, educators, researchers, and policymakers across Europe are making a bigger claim: understanding money is not only a personal survival skill. It is a foundation of active citizenship and democratic resilience. That claim was the beating heart of the Financial and Economic Literacy NECE Lab in Vienna, a two-day gathering hosted by THE CIVICS Innovation Hub together with Znanje na djelu and the Erste Financial Life Park (FLiP), with the support of ERSTE Foundation. We were proud to be part of it, having Magdalena Basić Alando actively participate and present our own project, Financial Literacy for Rural Youth, and learning alongside practitioners from across the continent. This post pulls together what the research actually says, and what we saw play out in the room. The problem: too many young people can't apply what they know Start with the evidence. In the OECD's most recent international assessment of 15-year-olds, released in 2024, the picture is sobering: across the 14 OECD countries assessed, 18% of students on average do not have basic proficiency in financial literacy, meaning they cannot apply their knowledge to real-life situations involving financial decisions. The gap is not evenly distributed. Socio-economically disadvantaged students are over-represented among low performers, which risks entrenching inequality as those students become adults. In other words, the young people who most need economic confidence are the ones least likely to be given it — a pattern that maps neatly onto who feels shut out of public life more broadly. There is a hopeful flip side. Financial literacy and positive financial behaviour are linked: students with stronger skills behave more responsibly with money and are more forward-looking, with high performers markedly more likely than low performers to save. Skills, attitudes, and behaviour move together — which is exactly why how we teach matters as much as what we teach. The bigger claim: financial literacy feeds democratic participation Here is where the Vienna conversation went beyond personal finance. One of the Lab's expert speakers was Anna Lo Prete of the University of Turin, whose research sits right at this intersection — and whose work is among the clearest evidence we have on the question. Lo Prete's cross-country analysis documents a positive association between political participation — measured by the number of citizens voting in national elections — and the awareness of the trade-offs behind private and public decisions that basic financial education captures. Crucially, this is not just correlation dressed up: empirical models that control for a large set of other determinants of voter turnout indicate that financial literacy continues to have a positive and causal impact on electoral participation. Why would that be? The logic is intuitive once you see it. Understanding some economics and finance helps citizens grasp the reasons behind public intervention and weigh the pros and cons of policy proposals and agendas. A voter who understands taxation, public budgets, inflation, and debt is simply better equipped to evaluate the promises on a ballot — and harder to mislead. The catch: financial literacy alone isn't enough It would be too easy to conclude "teach kids about compound interest and democracy takes care of itself." The research is more demanding than that — and this nuance came up repeatedly in Vienna's group work. A recurring critique in the academic literature is that much mainstream financial education quietly frames citizens as consumers rather than participants. One influential analysis argues that dominant financial literacy programmes can end up promoting a limited, consumerist form of civic engagement, and that what is really needed is a critical, emancipatory civic financial literacy for an engaged citizenry able to extend and protect more robust conceptions of freedom and democracy. Scholars working on integrative economic education put the point sharply: financial literacy without civic competence remains a merely reactive skill rather than a source of genuine political agency, which is why financial literacy and civic competences should be understood as parts of a single integrative concept of economic education. The two only reach their full value when taught together — money knowledge that can read the system, not just cope with it. Europe is building the scaffolding None of this is happening in a vacuum. The policy architecture is catching up with the research. In 2023 the European Commission and the OECD jointly published a Financial Competence Framework for Children and Youth in the European Union. It is not only about interest rates and risk: alongside the four core content areas — money and transactions, planning and managing finances, risk and reward, and the financial landscape — the framework deliberately integrates cross-cutting dimensions including digital finance, sustainable finance, entrepreneurship, and citizenship. Citizenship is written into the framework by design. On the civic side, the Council of Europe's Reference Framework of Competences for Democratic Culture exists precisely to equip young people with the competences needed to defend and promote human rights, democracy and the rule of law, to act as active citizens, and to live peacefully together with others. Read the two frameworks side by side and the overlap is obvious: critical thinking, informed decision-making, and the confidence to participate. What this looks like in practice: rural youth and economic autonomy This is the gap our own project set out to close, and the reason we were presenting it in Vienna. Financial Literacy for Rural Youth: Building Democratic Resilience Through Economic Empowerment merges financial and civic education for an audience usually left out of both: young people in rural areas, who are systematically underrepresented in programmes that tend to be urban-centred. Working with our partners, the project equips rural GenZ participants in Croatia and Belgium with practical competences: budgeting, saving, investing, planning; through gamified, peer-to-peer, blended learning adapted to rural digital realities. But the design goes a step past personal finance, exactly along the lines the research recommends. Participants learn to analyse economic policies, financial products, and media narratives about money, so they can resist manipulation and make informed civic choices. The premise is that economic dependency and exclusion are themselves barriers to democratic participation, and that when young people understand how taxation, public budgets, and economic policy shape their own lives, they engage more meaningfully in democratic processes. A transnational peer exchange between Croatian and Belgian participants adds a cross-cultural, shared-European dimension, a small counterweight to the polarisation that tends to follow economic marginalisation. The pilot trainings in Croatia are already complete, with workshops in Belgium still ahead. And the methodology is being built to outlast the project and be shared amongst all stakeholders. Where the formal and non-formal worlds meet If there was one moment in Vienna that made the abstract concrete, it was the guided tour of the Erste Financial Life Park (FLiP), FLiP turns financial education into something you can walk through and touch: interactive stations where visitors make real-feeling budgeting decisions and immediately see the consequences. It is a vivid rebuttal to the idea that money education has to be dry. A theme the NECE Lab kept returning to, and one the research underlines, is the relationship between formal schooling and non-formal education. Classrooms provide reach and legitimacy; non-formal initiatives like ours provide the agility to reach underserved groups, experiment with gamified and peer-led methods, and adapt fast. The most promising path forward is not one or the other, but connective tissue between them: school systems that borrow the energy of non-formal approaches, and civic organisations whose toolkits can be picked up and used inside classrooms. The takeaway The case made in Vienna, and backed by the evidence, is straightforward but consequential. Financial literacy is not merely about helping individuals stay solvent. Done well, paired with civic competence rather than reduced to consumer advice, it strengthens people's capacity to understand the systems they live in, to resist manipulation, and to participate in the democratic decisions that shape their economic lives. In an era of rising costs, growing inequality, and declining trust in institutions, that capacity is not a luxury. It is infrastructure for democracy. We left Vienna grateful to all speakers for the intellectual grounding; to our fellow educators for the knowledge exchange and the good company; to the organisers: THE CIVICS Innovation Hub, Znanje na djelu, Erste Financial Life Park, and ERSTE Foundation, FLiP centre. The next chapter is being written in rural classrooms and community halls across Europe. We're glad to be part of it. Sources OECD (2024), PISA 2022 Results (Volume IV): How Financially Smart Are Students?, OECD Publishing. Lo Prete, A. (2024), Political participation and financial education: Understanding personal and collective trade-offs for a better citizenship, Economics Letters / ScienceDirect. Lo Prete, A., Financial education: From better personal finance to improved citizenship, Journal of Financial Literacy and Wellbeing, Cambridge Core. Arthur, C. (2012), Financial Literacy Education for Citizens: What Kind of Responsibility, Equality and Engagement?, Citizenship, Social and Economics Education (SAGE). Integrative Economic Education to Combine Citizenship Education and Financial Literacy (ResearchGate). European Union / OECD (2023), Financial Competence Framework for Children and Youth in the European Union, OECD Publishing. Council of Europe, Reference Framework of Competences for Democratic Culture (RFCDC).

AIAdmin Izvrsnost